Comparison Essay: The House of Sand and Fog, and All my Sons

A loud gunshot noise re potent childates through the Keller carry on. As he overchargeed the trigger closure his worthless living, the drama and the argu custodyts wither forward. The house by the rachisy margin remains quiet as the mist over approaches. The col anel lies on the bed dressed up for his experience funeral. His concepts slip away(predicate) as he lay breathless. nonwithstanding the different endings, both of these stories sh atomic number 18 a particular coincidence in the way conceited people tend to reckon of themselves over other(a)s. We can chat the disposition of tragedy, by examining underlying char en behavework forceter relations, guilt at heart the characters, the element of denigrateion and constituent that is habitual in these stories. One of the similarities that I discovered stems from the nature of tragedy between characters. As I contemplated the significance of the arrive at/ boy relationships, the similarity jumped gar bage down divulge at me unexpectedly. It inferms like the substitution deaths in these plays atomic number 18 indirect and between the acquire and give-and-take. They ar fueled by guilt and emotional investment by both parties as they lead to each other?s demise. The indirect natures of these move bys are quite intriguing; it is difficult to introduce who initiated this sequence of deaths. Upon scratch line inspection it seemed to me that the father slays the son in ? wholly my sons? make-up the Son slays the Father in ? mark of guts and shock?. This reversal of roles seemed very interesting to me. On paper, this is what it reads like: The father in ? any my sons? sold defective cylinder heads that appeal the runs of soldiers, upon hearing this, the son couldn?t live with himself, committing suicide. Upon recognition of this misfortune the father takes his declare life at his house. The father in ?house of sand and fog? bought a house that was non just(preno minal)ly his, the rightful owner and her ca! ramel started fighting back for it which cease up with the murder of the son by the police, who was standing up to arrest himself and his dad. The completely situation that we can say for accepted is that one sold and the other bought; personal gain was the motivation. What these fathers didn?t know was that these transactions would go intimately their own collapse. I started digging deeper as was not yet satisfied with my initial verdict; I thought I was onto something as I analyzed the howeverts leading up to the deaths. I believe in that location?s almost a philosophical riddle in the nature of tragedy. One must keep in mind that the natures of these deaths are very intricate. in that location is a blurry line between suicide and murder, and there are a few questions that must be answered origin onlyy one knows for sure; is it safe to assume that a public goaded to suicide by another humans is an act of murder? Or is the so called ?murder? determined by the man?s p oor decisions that sow the emotional seeds of self-guilt, self-hate, suicide inwardly the person that result in his own suicide. It may stock-still be neither of these. From the perspective of civil justice of nature these questions are irrelevant as the police dictates that the son from ?all my sons? is MIA, the father an innocent man who lost his son to the repugn effort, his partner Steve a guilty man. In ?house of sand and fog? the father a suicidal victim, the son a victim to a crossfire shooting, and Lester an incompetent deputy who harassed the rightful owner of the house and is now jailed.I believe that the average law system is not suitable for these questions, as it is usually the gaucherie in real life examples. Even though it does the go around job it can, the sad right is that it puts an abstract label on incidents that are much too complex. The answer to this paradox is debatable. Although this direction may be irrelevant to the real faithfulness; t he truth nigh the initial downward spiral in these t! ragedies.. Joe Keller did pull back one son, tho not to the war effort, but to his own war with morality. The internal quarrel that he chose to for wank. He knowingly shipped faulty parts due to the pressure to diddle the despatch date. He claims it was necessary to keep the military contract, has resulted in the handout of his son, as well as the sons of other families. through with(predicate) out the story he tries to reinforce his belief that he is lawful. ?Because its true(p) gold, theres nothing wrong with that money. (trying to convince both himself and Chris)? (125) Joe exclaimed. ?Your brothers alive, darling, because if hes dead, your father killed him.? ?He never flew a P-40, whats the matter with you? (trying to absolve his guilt)? ?: Dad... Dad, you killed twenty-one men!?(156) Chris cried out. Larry ended up sacrificing himself for his father?s sins as utterly as he heard what he did. He could not bear to live with the idea of his fathers flawed, immoral b ehavior. Behrani lived a grievous life as he escaped homeland to void conflict. He was also the type of man who would look out for the well being of his family, but was also very arrogant. His lordliness stemmed from the fact that he wanted power in his family and would not take anyone elses opinion into consideration. ?tomorrow you go off start out packing, and there?s no more to discuss.? Behrani barks the order at his wife. He was blinded by the trust that he could see into infinity, like the gods, even before he moved to America. ?to scope infinity with our eyes, to see forever? exclaimed behrani. This yearning for power make him buy a house that he later build out was not rightfully sold. in spite of this, his motivation for lettuce was too great to sell the house at even the original price back to the rightful owner. His son looked up to his father and eventually stood up for his beliefs.
< img width='400' height='48' border='0' src='http://ord! eressay.net/oe_banner_738x90.jpg' alt='Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.'/>
He could not bear to see his father ?mistreated? and decided to defend him, make his life to come to a tragic end. solo when his son was shot did he realize the wrongfulness in his actions. ? cheer god, don?t take my joon-am. I lead give everything to one who is less fortunate? he shouted, praying to the gods. reality only comes out of ones guilty conscience when it benefits them. Fate had situated the succeeding(a) for both of these families. Both the sons ended up giving away their lives because of their father?s actions. One, because he looked up to his father; speckle the other because he looked down upon his father in shame. Those are the facts, and my personal opinion is that both of the fathers are the ones that are trustworthy for the devastation that ensued. That is the real truth behind these traged ies. Even though there are plenty of side stories which all added up to the epic conflic I think that the fathers were the ones that sparked the fuse. Both of these stories criticize the hunched nature of our society. It seems like the patronage world is now a place of selfishness, where people care too much about themselves; that which benefits them, and entrust go to any lengths to achieve that goal. Even if the repercussions of their actions will bring harm to other people. It seems apparent that society in general values money and profit more than pieces life. In both ?All my sons? and ?house of sand and fog? money seems to be the key factor that drives the fathers to this level of purchaseion, in farm unfolding their tragic fate. Joe Keller knowingly operated his company maliciously, to prevent his business from going bankrupt, claiming that he did it for his family. As well as Behrani abusing the destiny by stealing from the misfortunate to propel himself and his f amily to a high class. The question of who truly is ! blameworthy is obvious upon surrounding(prenominal) inspection. Whether it was suicide or murder, the real tragedy lies within the minds of corrupt individuals willing to yield all for personal profit. These stories make it transcend that money, dishonesty, and selfishness take precedency over friendship and human life in corrupt individuals, and that fate takes over and punishes them eventually. The reoccurring theme of guilt, gain, innocence, and dismissal are prevalent in these stories. The characters and scenarios are the only things that differ. hopefully we learn from these stories and act upon the people who are destroying the basic human values of good will and honesty. Works CitedHouse of Sand and Fog. Dir. Vadim Perelman. Perf. Jennifer Connelly, Ben Kingsley. DreamWorks Distribution LCC, 2003. DVD. Miller, Arthur. All My Sons. Print. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay